This is very good news, maybe the tide is turning?
Commentary: Below is a report showing that the regulatory agency is wrong about GMOs, again. To add to the pesticide and widespread chemical contamination of air, water, soil, wildlife, and foods now include genetics. This means gene transfers between GMO species and non-GMO species that will probably produce monsters of all sorts. At first these will be eliminated because most monsters are lethal, but given enough time we should expect real monsters. Scientific fiction may be a realistic means for seeing the future.
Gads, where can one hide? Nowhere, so fight we must.
We and our associates founded and published two journals for over 30 years through a non-profit called the BioIntegral Resource Center (BIRC). When we left the organization we turned management over to Bill Quarles who has carried the task since while maintaining the same high standards in publishing and research. Here are some recent publications of special interest for those concerned about the toxic effects of pesticides on and detailed methods for using alternatives, especially within Integrated Pest Management Programs,
Continue Reading →
URBAN AGRICULTURAL NOTES:
GMOs and Seed Savings
By William Olkowski, PhD, 9.9.12.
The take over of the seed industry documented below has only occurred recently and is primarily aimed at pushing Genetically Modified Seeds. This is done by monopolizing all seed sources available to farmers but only selling the GMO seeds. The farmers who don’t participate are sued when the pollens are blown onto their crops which then become contaminated. These contaminated crops are then subject to patent law infringement and the farmer is sued. This is a deliberate attempt to manipulate by threat so farmers will buy the GMO seeds. Certainly this is an unethical practice, but if you have only money in mind ethics will always be dammed.
What is most puzzling about this whole situation is that farmers are not suing for having their crops contaminated. I know that farmers can’t afford the costs of suing, even if they thought they could win against such big corporations. And I suspect there are no laws comparable to the patent laws, which involve property rights. Property rights must be superior to pollution rights, especially in an era of deregulation.
In any case the world food supply is threatened by these seed monopolies and the GMO crop take over strategies.
What To Do Now?
First, don’t buy any seeds or products sold by these companies (see list below), and hope California passes the label GMO proposition 37. If CA labels the rest of the US may follow. But note that only Canada and the US have not passed a labeling law. 50 other countries have done so.
Next, start to grow your own foods, starting with vegetables. I have been professing this for over 40 years and now all is becoming clearer and thousands of people are now starting to grow their own. By growing your own vegetables you get pesticide free food, at little cost, and can begin to save your own seeds.
The following extract from The City People’s Book of Raising Food (by H. and W. Olkowski, out of print but to be released again in the spring) is instructive about saving seeds.
“We have had particular luck with saving our own seeds from peas, beans, carrots, onions (they will flower the second season), lettuce, coriander, New Zealand spinach, chard, cooking celery, parsley, upland cress, and tomato. With most of the above you can either collect the seed from the dried flower head, or, as in the case of chard, keep the entire branchlet of seed pods stored for the winter. With tomatoes you’ll need to mash away the pulp from the seeds. Then dry them thoroughly, spread out on a paper towel or screen, before you store them away.”
All seed, whether bought or saved from your own garden, should be kept in a cool, dry place. This is essential as you want seeds that will germinate with vigor the following season. Be attentive to selecting seeds from an individual plant that is vigorous, or earliest and most productive. Mark it with a ribbon or marker, so as not to harvest it by mistake.
We have also been successful in letting many different plants go to seed in the garden and harvest seedlings to eat directly or weed them out where you want to plant something else. I call it chaos gardening and have developed a philosophical essay to support the concept (to see this essay tune into the entomological philosopher.com, my blog, search under chaos.
The urban agriculturalist is in a good place to lead the development of a new set of land races in competition to the seed companies of the world. Good luck and good night.
SEED INDUSTRY DATA 2007
Originally seeds were overwhelmingly in the hands of farmers and public-sector plant breeders.
Gene Giants have used intellectual property laws to commodify seed supply – a strategy that aims to control plant germplasm and maximize profits by eliminating Farmers’ Rights.
In 2007 the global proprietary seed market was valued at US $22B which constituted 82% of the worldwide commercial seed market (According to Context Network).
The proprietary seed market is even bigger. This includes brand-name seed that is subject to exclusive monopoly, i.e. intellectual property. In 2007 total commercial seed market was valued at $26B (does not include farmer-saved seed).
The World’s Top 10 Seed Companies
2007 seed sales (US$ millions) – % of global proprietary seed market (Source: ETC Group).
1.Monsanto (US) – $4.9B – 23%
2.DuPont (US) – $3.3B – 15%
3.Syngenta (Switzerland) – $2B – 9%
4.Groupe Limagrain (France) – $1.2B – 6%
5.Land O’ Lakes (US) – $917m – 4%
6.KWS AG (Germany) – $702m – 3%
7.Bayer Crop Science (Ge) – $524m – 2%
8.Sakata (Japan) – $396m – <2%
9.DLF-Trifolium (Denmark) – $391m – <2%
10.Takii (Japan) – $347m – <2%
Top 10 Total – $14.785B – 67% (2/3 )of global Proprietary Seed Market
Adding up, Monsanto, DuPont, Syngenta account for 47% of the worldwide proprietary seed market.
Monsanto’s biotech seeds and traits (including those licensed to other companies) accounted for 87% of the total world area devoted to genetically engineered seeds in 2007 (ETC Group).
Monsanto licenses its biotech traits to 250 companies
< 48% of DuPont’s seed revenue came from products that carried a biotech trait.
Global value of GM crops in 2007 at $6.9 billion (Cropnosis).